Before this week, I didn't realize that a debate on this topic existed, but now I see that there are two very clear sides to the argument. The question posed is whether cursive writing should be replaced in schools by instruction in word processing programs. I disagree and would argue that cursive writing should continue to be taught in schools; however, I would further argue that instruction should also be given in word processing programs.
While word processing systems hold many beneficial advantages as far as use in the classroom, it would be unwise to halt the instruction of cursive writing. This old-fashioned form of writing is useful in practicing fine motor skills and provides a logical means of putting a creative touch on one's own writing, as each individual's handwriting is unique. Furthermore, it is a good method for assessing the level at which a student stands in their learning on various levels.
Word processing systems should also be taught in upper elementary grades as it gives many options for students to easily revise and update their drafts, as well as many more advantages.
In the Hypothetical Classroom, students will be taught early on to begin using cursive handwriting and a bit later will be given instruction in word processing programs.
